ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for March 16, 2013

What are your thoughts about this? [and from another] http://washingtonexaminer.com/wolf-says-nasa-aided-hire-linked-to-chinese-espionage-may-be-dozens-more/article/2523556  NASA prompted hiring of person linked to Chinese espionage. May be dozens more in agency. March 7, 2013 This Chinese national is affiliated with an institution in China that has been designated as an “entity of concern” by other U.S. government agencies.  Not only was he provided access and information he never should have received – working directly on technology that may have national security implications -- but he was also allegedly allowed by both NASA and his contractor to take his work and volumes of other NASA research back to China for a period of time. [and from another] Rep. Wolf, who is chairman of a House Appropriations subcommittee that oversees NASA - said he was told about the practice by 'whistleblowers' at the facility in Hampton, Virginia. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2290169/Enemies-midst-House-Representative-claims-NASA-let-Chinese-spy-classified-information-space-research-centre.html  [and from another] http://spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=40278  Even more troubling is that this Chinese national was allegedly employed by a Langley contractor allegedly at the direction of NASA officials in an apparent attempt to circumvent appropriations restrictions the Congress has in place to prevent the hiring of certain foreign nationals of concern. Additionally, it is my understanding that NASA spent several hundred thousand dollars to pay for this individual's contract. I have also received information that at least several dozen other Chinese nationals - none of whom have U.S. citizenship and many who do not even have green cards - are currently working at Langley under a similar scheme. [and from another] http://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/news/researchernews/NEOinterview.html  Langley NEO Expert Interviewed by Local Media [and from another] http://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/about/history.html  For most of the first half of its 90 years in existence the Langley Aeronautical Laboratory concentrated on aviation. When the U.S. decided to develop a reusable spacecraft NASA turned once again to Langley. Researchers in Hampton put space shuttle designs through thousands of hours of wind tunnel testing.

Why would the NASA center at Langley, Virginia (close to the CIA headquarters) be sharing data and technology with a Chinese national , and going to lengths to evade US law about such sharing? On the face of it, it looks like sloppy management. But a close look at the Langley specialties shows that the current concerns about inbound bolides, such as the once recently shot down over Russia, are the nexus. Langley has NEO specialists, showing they focus on inbound objects with a Near Earth Orbit. Their history is likewise testing space bound shuttles, and space flights issues, such as would be encountered if anti-bolide missiles were to be launched into space.

Given what both China and the US know about the pending passage, and the debris in the tail of Planet X, aka Nibiru, their priorities are not theft of technologies, but arriving at viable solutions quickly. Solutions they do not have at present, we might add. Faced with laws and rules to eliminate espionage and theft, NASA at Langley maneuvered to have a contractor hire the Chinese, but a whistleblower blew this arrangement into the media. Representative Wolf will, of course, be privately educated about the pending passage, and can be expected to back off.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-AP5HFo0XE  This comet C2012 ISON video by NASA is unusual as : 1. Johnny Carson is quoted. 2. Comet of the Century is implied 3. Will it fizzle or sizzle? Its appearance does not strike me as a dirty snowball. In the press there is mention of it being as bright as the moon.  A week later it could be 15 times brighter than the moon according to another report. Where should this luminescence come from? The possible anticipated breakup into a string of pearls, they are certain the breakup will follow the same path. This latter part does not make any sense whatsoever. On the NASA JPL it appears to be too slow to be a comet. I sure would appreciate any thoughts on this comet.

Why would NASA specifically point out the rare comet phenomena during a breakup, where the appearance, albeit under magnification, is of a String of Pearls? Can this in any way compare to the many photos and SOHO images already in hand showing String of Pearls in the lineup of Moon Swirls and moons in the tail of Planet X? These have been visible naked eye in the past, since the arrival of Planet X, aka Nibiru in the inner solar system in 2003. Photos taken in 2003 and 2004 when the complex was at a distance from the Earth show this with great clarity. Photos and SOHO images continue to show the String of Pearls, though no comet is present to point to as the cause.  

Why would NASA be inserting this rare comet event into a video under their name, when the announcement on the near presence of Planet X, aka Nibiru, is about to occur? C2012 ISON will make its pass around the Sun in late 2013, and given the increasing visibility of the Planet X complex components, the truth will surely be obvious. Those in NASA aligned with the cover-up crowd hope to continue to dissuade and confuse the public, as to the cause of the Earth changes - the increasing booms and earthquakes as the plates move, erupting volcanoes, and the documentable Earth wobble putting the Sun out of place on a daily basis. All this is to be put aside by those clinging to denial and clinging to NASA’s explanations. Or so they hope.

Grimly recalcitrant Coverup proponents, who have a death-grip on their Veil of Lies, refuse to concede defeat and move to thwart any attempted Truth Announcement by the POTUS, at every turn, must be choking on their cigars at what can only be called another NASA wrong again, and for them, what is also another Lie shot to bits. NASA has trumpeted from the rooftops for a couple years that Sol would go all Rambo on us, deal death and destruction when he awoke to Solar Maximum in 2011. Of course the Sun would not play, preferred slumber, and so they pushed it back to 2012. Again no cigar, Sol is still pretty laid back in that year too. Unsurprisingly, they push it back again, to 2013, as noted in this 2010 newsletter:  http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue192.htm.  Do I hear 2014?? Collective egg on face, again for NASA, and the Coverup et al, as exasperated chuckles pass the lips of many TruthSeekers when it is publicly conceded by NASA that 2013 was due to be year of the 'solar maximum' and yet the sun is incredibly calm - baffling experts who are hypothesizing that something unexpected is happening to the Sun. Would the Zeta care to revisit this? Speak to whether or not there are any other forces at play in all of this? [and from another] NASA warns solar flares from 'huge space storm' will cause devastation http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7819201/Nasa-warns-solar-flares-from-huge-space-storm-will-cause-devastation.html  June 14, 2010 [and from another] The Calm Before the Solar Storm? NASA Warns Something Unexpected is Happening to the Sun  March 8, 2013 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2290289/NASA-warns-unexpected-happening-Sun-year-supposed-peak-sunspot-cycle.html#ixzz2N9u8ibC6  This year was supposed to be the year of 'solar maximum,' the peak of the 11-year sunspot cycle.  Sunspot numbers are well below their values from 2011, and strong solar flares have been infrequent, as this image shows - despite Nasa forecasting major solar storms. Experts have been baffled by the apparent lack of activity - with many wondering if NASA simply got it wrong. However, Solar physicist Dean Pesnell of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center believes he has a different explanation. The last two solar maxima, around 1989 and 2001, had not one but two peaks. [and from another] Scientists Predict Big Solar Cycle December 21, 2006 http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/21dec_cycle24.htm  Solar cycle 24, due to peak in 2010 or 2011 "looks like its going to be one of the most intense cycles since record-keeping began almost 400 years ago," says solar physicist David Hathaway of the Marshall Space Flight Center. He and colleague Robert Wilson presented this conclusion last week at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco.

Left with egg on their faces for all their wrong predictions, NASA scientists are now trying to re-write history. The solar maximum for cycle 24 was originally projected for 2010-2011. Then it was extended to 2012 to align with the 2012 Mayan Calendar predictions, in part, but also because the solar minimum was showing the Sun to be shockingly quiescent.  Sunspots were virtually absent. Now as 2012 is past and the Sun has still not approached the expected maximum, they are pushing the dates once again. They are caught in a web of their own lies.

Would Zetas like to decode Obama's underlining messages to the politicians and the press of his remarks at the Gridiron Dinner? He did mention that he's got an entire team in the situation room planning his next golf outing in this March Madness - would this be a hint on what's to come re pending announcement? [and from another] http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/03/10/read-president-obamas-remark-at-the-gridiron-dinner/  As I was saying, we face major challenges.  March in particular is going to be full of tough decisions.  But I want to assure you, I have my top advisors working around the clock. After all, my March Madness bracket isn’t going to fill itself out.   And don’t worry — there is an entire team in the situation room as we speak, planning my next golf outing, right now at this moment. 

Obama’s joke had a double meaning. Those not in the know would assume he was joking about the sequester, the need to cut back on staff and services. After all, the White House tours had just been canceled, and in light of his expensive golf weekend were criticized. But for those in the know, and recently brought into that circle via private luncheons with Obama, it carried a different meaning. He is encouraging those in the know to be open and relaxed about the forthcoming announcement. Focus groups had shown that the cover-up had been so effective that people would think the truth a hoax. Part of the pre-announcement public relations has been to start chatter, so that at least those in the media would take the announcement seriously, and not fear to present the truth to the public.

I have question about the nuclear accident in Fukushima. How does the nuclear power plants that did meltdown turn out? [and from another] http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-10/fukushima-toxic-waste-swells-as-japan-marks-march-11-disaster.html  Contaminated clothing represents just a fraction of the waste facing Tokyo Electric Power Co. (9501) in a cleanup that may take four decades. A tour of the plant last week went past rows of grey and blue tanks holding enough irradiated water to fill 100 Olympic pools on the plateau overlooking Dai-Ichi’s four ruined reactors. And the water keeps coming. The utility estimates it may be eight years before radiation levels fall enough to let workers start the main task of removing 260 tons of melted nuclear fuel. That process took more than a decade at the U.S. accident on Three Mile Island, a partial meltdown at a single reactor containing about one fifth the amount of fuel at Fukushima.

Full meltdown at the damaged Fukushima plants is being contained by cooling water until the radiation level is reduced to the point where it can be processed – encapsulated and dumped into the Pacific Ocean. Will the Earth changes proceed so slowly that the 8 years estimated for this process to take can unfold? As we mentioned, Fukushima received intervention in part, to protect the common man who was not responsible for the accident, but likewise allowed to present a disaster to those too concerned about face-saving and profits. When the Pole Shift occurs, and the pumps stop the cooling water, Fukushima will still be hot. But the Earth changes will be arranged to bury the location so that radiation does not contaminate the region for survivors in northern Japan.

In the past the Zetas -- and only the Zetas -- have been willing to reveal some of what goes on at elites' secret, face-to-face meetings where Nibiru/Planet X and the pending pole shift have been discussed. A couple of Republicans who recently learned President Obama intends to announce the reality of Planet X/Nibiru (Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Paul Ryan (R-WI)) attended the closed door, no press allowed American Enterprise Institute's (AEI) annual forum at Sea Island, Georgia.  Interestingly, Representative Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) -- who attended a recent private lunch with President Obama -- and White House economic advisor Gene Sperling were also at the AEI Forum. Could the Zetas tell us if Nibiru, the pending Planet X announcement, and what it all means were discussed at the American Enterprise Institute Forum?  Were Rep. Chris Van Hollen and White House advisor Gene Sperling in attendance specifically to talk about Planet X? [and from another] John Boehner, Paul Ryan, Dick Cheney, Rupert Murdoch headline closed-door retreat March 12, 2013
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/john-boehner-paul-ryan-dick-cheney-rupert-murdoch-headline-closed-door-retreat-88776.html?hp=r8  Some of the biggest names in Republican politics spent last weekend hobnobbing behind closed doors at a swanky resort on the Georgia coast. House Speaker John Boehner and former Vice President Dick Cheney were among those at the American Enterprise Institute’s annual forum on Sea Island, Ga. Capitol Hill was well represented, with Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Reps. Paul Ryan and Jeb Hensarling, and Sens. Lindsey Graham, Ted Cruz, Ron Johnson, John Cornyn and Saxby Chambliss. Media mogul Rupert Murdoch was there, as were plenty of big donors. The event — which was invitation-only, closed to the press, and is reported here for the first time — even drew a few Democrats, including Rep. Chris Van Hollen and White House economic adviser Gene Sperling. [and from another] Obama Invites Ryan, Van Hollen to White House Lunch March 7, 2013 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-07/obama-said-to-invite-ryan-van-hollen-to-white-house.html  President Barack Obama invited House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan and Chris Van Hollen, the panel’s top Democrat, to lunch today as he seeks to restart talks on a long-term deal to reduce the federal deficit. The lunch today follows Obama’s dinner last night at a Washington hotel with a dozen Republican senators.

The AEI is clearly a solidly Republican organization, with Murdock, Chenney, and Republican donors invited along with Republican politicians from Washington DC. So why would two Democrats be invited? Representative Chris Van Hollen was invited as well as his Republican counterpart Paul Ryan, both involved in budget legislation in the House. But why White House advisor Gene Sperling? The common nexus for Van Hollen and Sperling is special access to Obama, as many of the Republicans invited to the AEI luncheon recently enjoyed. As we have noted, the pending announcement was discussed at these very private luncheons. For those not given such access to Obama, the word is spreading word of mouth. How will the Republican elite react?  

Few of the attendees are unaware of the presence of Planet X, aka Nibiru, and the pending passage, as they are among the world’s elite – the wealthy and politically powerful.  What was new were the plans to announce this to the public. Most at the AEI assumed the cover-up would continue until the last minute, the Last Weeks, when denial would no longer be possible. The pending announcement is a game changer for them. The slow migration to their bunkers and militia guarded enclaves will be expedited.  Divesting of assets likely to become worthless early in the process will be expedited. And suppressing an accurate depiction of the global cataclysm to come will become an even greater imperative. Planet X may be admitted, but the ZetaTalk description of the outcome will continue to be denied.

The new pope seems to be very humble; refusing the papal car and refusing to sit elevated above others in speeches. http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/14/17307513-humility-and-humor-pope-francis-declines-official-car-jokes-with-cardinals?lite  Would the Zetas care to comment on this?  Is his orientation different from Benedict and if so, how will this effect the Church and the handling of the Announcement?  There also seems to be a lot of surprise that he was chosen to be pope even among those within the Vatican.  Would the Zetas care to comment on how and why he was chosen? [and from another] Francis of Assisi:  Wikipedia St. Francis of Assisi (Italian: San Francesco d'Assisi, baptized Giovanni, born Francesco di Pietro di Bernardone; 1181/1182 – October 3, 1226) was an Italian Catholic friar and preacher. Francesco di Pietro.  Pietro is Peter.  The new pope is Argentine of Italian decent. There you have it. Peter the Roman. [and from another] People are finding connections to "Petrus Romanus". Petrus means rock or stone, and "stone of Rome" means black rock. The head of the Jesuits is called the black pope, black tied to the Jesuits. [and from another] http://www.catholiccompany.com/content/What-the-Catholic-Church-Teaches-About-the-Rapture.cfm The word “rapture” comes from the Latin word meaning “to be caught up” or “taken up”. This refers to the passage in St. Paul’s letter to the Thessalonians 4:17 which states, “then we who are alive, who are left, shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air; and so we shall always be with the Lord.” The Catholic understanding of this passage is that those believers who are alive during Christ’s second coming will not experience death, but rather, will be gloriously transformed and join the saints already with Christ.

If the concerns of the Vatican when Pope Benedict was chosen were the pedophile scandal and the rising costs of paying off the victims, the concerns when Pope Francis was chosen are the pending announcement admitting the near presence of Planet X, aka Nibiru. Wishing to maintain their influence with the flock, to assure what they hope will be a continuation of the Catholic Church, it is logical they choose someone with a kindly and humble image, thus the Saint Malachy prediction. If Pope Benedict’s past was management of the Office of Inquisition, in charge of suppressing the testimony of pedophile victims, Pope Francis has pastoral work in his past, reaching out to and comforting the common man.

It is no surprise that he was chosen and is rumored to have been the runner up when Pope Benedict was chosen. At a time when the flock will be suffering, due to the Earth changes, arrogant demands that funds continue to flow to support the opulent lifestyles of the hierarchy of the Church would be resented. This will now be hidden behind the humble demeanor and habits of Pope Francis, who will be used like a shield.  That Pope Francis is among the Jesuit Order was part of the selection process, as this order is noted for their dedication. There will be no essential changes in the Catholic Church, which we predict will sink and essentially disappear in the Aftertime primarily for two reasons – it will be clear to the faithful that the Church lied about the Third Fatima vision, and the promised rapture of the faithful will not occur.